Finished: 01 AM Fri 21 Mar 14 UTC
1648
1 day, 12 hours /phase
Pot: 42 D - Autumn, 1654, Finished
1 excused NMR / no regaining / extend the first 1 turn(s)
Game won by ZoMBi3 (1012 D)

< Return

Chat archive

1
...
Country:


17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: What is the significance of the free imperial cities?
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: basically their neutral and will be destroyed when forced to retreat
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: Also you can not move knights into them.
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: The Bavarian Wittelsbach house expresses its intentions to leave the Austrian territories alone. A reciprocated notion would be noted and appreciated.
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: The Hohenzollern House offer different agreements to some Lords:
*** a pact with the Ecclesiastic Landlords represented by ERAUfan97: if you accept not to attack me (especially my CoM) and to let me take peacefully LHD, I will not attack you (especially BoW);
*** a pact of reciprocal no aggression with Wettin: I'll not attack you or move to Duchy of Silesia and you'll not attack me or move to AoMa;
*** a pact of reciprocal no aggression and an alliance with Bavarian Wittelsbach: we can cooperate to dislodge PoNe and to take Regensburg, Nuremberg, Ulm and Augsburg, sharing them between us (you can take Regensburg and support me to take PoNe, then you can take Augsburg and in the future I will support you to take Ulm and you can support me to take Nurenberg)

please, answer me if you're interested, thanks!
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: man, this map looks so confusing haha
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: really, the German situation at that period was more confused than in this map!!! because in many places (inside towns and lands), differents forces were acting one against the others....: Germany needed more than 2 centuries to..."simplify" the real map......!
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: I am not quite interested in cooperation as of yet Hohenzollern, however I am interested in a non-aggression pact.
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: ok, I accept the NAP,...and I remain open to a possible future cooperation if you want.....
17 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1648: Of course.
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: well, at least I know I cannot be eliminated since nobody can take Bishopric of Trient
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: Not true. Knights can support attacks into spaces two territories over.
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: curse this
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: Wait, what?
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: read the rules my friends.
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: everyone just stay away from BoT and we should be fine!
19 Feb 14 UTC Autumn, 1648: Interesting rules..
19 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1649: Lord of Wettin, I repeat the offer of a general NAP between you and me and, if you want, of a cooperation and a sharing of SCs: do you accept or do you prefer a war that will damnage both?
19 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1649: Bishops and Archibishops of the Ecclesiastic Lands, I repeat the offer of a general NAP between you and me and, if you want, of a cooperation and a sharing of SCs: do you accept or do you prefer a war that will damnage both?
19 Feb 14 UTC Spring, 1649: Lord of Bavarian Wittelsbach, I confirm the general NAP between you and me that was so useful for both in the first year, and, when you want, of a cooperation and a sharing of SCs

1
...