17 Sep 19 UTC | Spring, 1901: (calbone455): Yo |
17 Sep 19 UTC | Spring, 1901: (calbone455): Yo |
17 Sep 19 UTC | Spring, 1901: Afternoon chaps. |
17 Sep 19 UTC | Spring, 1901: Can we make a rule 0 alliances so it’s balanced |
18 Sep 19 UTC | Spring, 1901: Fair enough |
18 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1901: Sure. |
20 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1903: no i hit ready on acident and didnt support hold |
22 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1904: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. |
22 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1904: Did Russia just walk away from the game? |
22 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1904: Still time to go |
24 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1904: GameMaster: Game was extended due to at least 1 member failing to enter orders and having an excused missed turn available. This has un-readied all orders. |
25 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1904: GameMaster: Papamuntz has taken over Russia replacing "calbone455". Reconsider your alliances. |
26 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1906: Well that's frustrating. Things were going pretty well for me until Russia decided to just abandon the game completely and Turkey was a walk through. |
26 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1906: Indeed. That's not fair at all. I propose you this: I will support Silesia>Warsaw and hold Moscow, so you can take St. Petersburg. After that we draw. In exchange you do not attack Spain anymore. It would be quite easy for me to solo this game but I don't like to win in this circunstances. Fair enough for you? |
26 Sep 19 UTC | Autumn, 1906: Sounds good to me. |
27 Sep 19 UTC | GameMaster: Italy voted for a Draw. If everyone votes Draw the game will end and the points are split equally among all the surviving players, regardless of how many supply centers each player has. |
27 Sep 19 UTC | Well played. |
27 Sep 19 UTC | GG |