30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1901: perfect. we swapped sides. :) |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1901: yep! good luck |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1901: ha. i will need it against you. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Autumn, 1901: with the Austria advantage, i am going to have a hard time. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Autumn, 1901: you have kicked my ass every game so far so I dont think so lol |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Autumn, 1901: lol |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1902: just lucky. you are good. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1905: damn. i needed to get Munich. :( gg. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | Spring, 1905: gg, this one is mine |
30 Dec 13 UTC | gg |
30 Dec 13 UTC | well played. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | I think you would probably play a stronger france if you open piedmont instead of bur picardy. Gives you more interesting possibilities |
30 Dec 13 UTC | yeah. i agree. it is a better approach, but i thought i could change it up and throw you off a little. ;) |
30 Dec 13 UTC | i try to change my openings so that if someone looks at my history, they can't just assume how i will open. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | lol yeah, 1v1 that does not work, I think that line of reasoning was the one that sent me to turkey as france |
30 Dec 13 UTC | trying to play differently |
30 Dec 13 UTC | lol. |
30 Dec 13 UTC | maybe my problem is i am playing someone who is too good. I should only look to play rookies. :D |
30 Dec 13 UTC | I understand, I think I always play the first year the same way anyway, because the advantages of opening with austria fleet in venice and with army in piedmont are too big and there is little that can be done to answer those moves. From 2nd year on it probably does change a lot. |