24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Sorry it took me forever to join, I forgot this site had the Notices page to check through just PMs. |
24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: What's the idea, again? Testing the Austrian move to Piedmont, I think... |
24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Yes. Since I am Austria, just play the Northern as you normally would. |
24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1902: Eh...?? |
24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1902: Problem? ;>_> |
24 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: Heh now you can't build F Mar. That might cause some problems. |
24 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1903: The lack of an extra unit is a pain in the rear moreso than the lack of F Mar. Though I do think I'd rather be in Munich with a fleet in Marseilles right now. *sigh* |
24 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1903: Of course. Maybe Piedmont is a good idea. |
24 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1903: Yeah, you've got this one, though I tend to think France has a counter somewhere in here. |
24 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1903: Hmm yes. It's good to know though that Austria can come up with a good defense plan to France opening north. |
25 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1904: Nasty guesses coming ahead. Will I support myself to Berlin or Munich? And what will happen in GoL/WMS? |
25 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1904: Answer: magic |
25 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1904: Time to build an army Vienna and bottle everything up :D |
25 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: Yeah, this one's over. Hot damn, though. There is a counter to the northern opening. I guess the counter-counter is to bounce Piedmont. =P |
25 May 11 UTC | I wonder if I made some mistakes, though. I think that given I had to allow the Piedmont move to go through as part of the test I really didn't, but in retrospect the move to Piedmont has to become canon for a northern opening. |
25 May 11 UTC | I don't know. Maybe bouncing Piedmont will work....want to test? |