26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: (yoak): I think that this will be an interesting twist on the variant. The "fog" aspect is partially neutralized by having all of your statements visible to those who neighbor you. I already find Fog extremely interesting and fun, and this adds another layer of complexity atop it. |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: Greetings! Russia, DMZ Gal or bounce? I'd prefer the DMZ. Italy and Germany, how about a three-way DMZ of Tyrolia, Germany, if you'll stay out of Boh, I will. :-) |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: Hello everyone! :) Wish a good game to all. @Austria I agree. I like DMZ Bohemia and Tyrolia. @Russia I would like to DMZ Prussia and Silesia, I want non-agression pact. Sweden is yours, my is Denmark, deal? @England, I want help you anyway I can :). I want to take at least Holland and Denmark, I will see what will want France. What about you, how do you feel about this game? @France I hope we'll find peace. But we also need to negotiate. What about Belgium? Do you want it? I don't have any intentions in taking that, but I want you to take it next year, do you agree? Do you think you'll find peace with England? If yes, I'll like it. @Italy anything you want me to do? I'm here for you :) @Turkey.. Nevermind to far.. :d |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: It certainly will be interesting to combine fog and public press. @Germany, allo to you too. Let's see what we can do. May I land in Belgium if you're in Holland? @France, how to you feel about a Belgium landing? (I'm curious how I operate on the continent with public press!) Shall we dmz the English Channel? I'm happy simply to have my name on it, I don't need a fleet there too. A shout out to the rest of you as well. Bonne chance! |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: Hi all. Good luck. |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @England. I agree to a DMZ in the English channel. If this is upheld from your side, I am OK with you taking Belgium. Peace. |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany I am inclined to buy peace with England with Belgium, but if he enters English Channel, then I am open to discussions on it. |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: I don't find Franco-German war very profitable, so I propose a bounce in Burgundy in spring 1901. What do you say? |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Italy. I will not be heading your way unless attacked. I propose Piedmont as a DMZ. What do you think? |
26 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: To Austria, Turkey and Russia... France is ready to send you highly reliable info on this foggy landscape. Trust in the French news service. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Austria DMZ in gal sounds good to me |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @England happy to hear it. France proposes you a Belgium. What I acrully don't like, but what so ever. I accept it of course, haha :d. How do you feel like with Scandinavia? @France, I don't was t a bounce in Bur. I think we have better options, I trust you and I don't think we need to bounce. I think setting Bur DMZ is better. At least for now. I think you have better choices to make. You may just simply take Spain and Portugal with both of your armies and sail your fleet a lot, what can give you a big advantage. @Russia anything? |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany... Not sure why you trust me yet, but nice to hear. Anyway I'd rather build the trust over time so that's why I'm letting you know I will move to Bur with 1 unit and I'm ok with a bounce. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @England. I am OK with you taking Belgium if English Channel is empty but it seems Germany is not happy with this. Let us know what you prefer to do. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @France. I understand. I will decide, if I bounce you. Also I trust you because, you, England and me are little bit allied yet and I hope if you stab me, England will not allow you to be strongest one in west Europe and help me to take you down. @England and France. I prefer France take it rather than England. Because Russia doesn't seem talkative, he may try to bounce England in Norway by moving Moscow-St.Pete. In that case England will have Belgium, that is good for him only to attack Germany or France, also if France or me decide to stab and try for solo, Belgium will be easier to take under English control than French. That's why I don't like it. I think army in Norway for 100% is better for us than Belgium and maybe Norway. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany and Austria, a DMZ in Tyrolia sounds mutually beneficial to me. You may consider it demilitarized. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @France, I would also like to establish Piedmont as a DMZ. I will even go so far as to say the Gulf of Lyon is off limits as well, as presence there is more convenient for me and would unnecessary tension in Marseilles. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Italy agreed on Pie and GoL. Thanks. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Italy great. I hope we won't see a conflict in centrál Europe |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1901: @Germany (and France) I hear you regarding Belgium. I appreciate you both letting me land there. I see a hostile Russia a bit differently than you. If bounced in Norway I'd use my Belgian build to gear up against Russia. I think public press makes it hard for me to do anything sneaky from Belgium. It may well be that Russia is the player who hasn't inputted any orders. I hope he's not awol. (The vodka in St Peterburg staff headquarters flows rather freely I hear.) |