Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 96 of 164
FirstPreviousNextLast
DEFIANT (1311 D)
15 Nov 13 UTC
A New Era -- Is Close
Looking for 12 players that will enjoy a good challenge, the lineup so far is very respectable, could use a few more good players, please join.
Thanks!
10 replies
Open
tobi1 (1997 D Mod (S))
07 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
Extending the advanced options for game creation?
Hi,
what do you think about making some variant-specific features like BuildAnywhere, Pick your Countries or Fog of War a general option for every game?
(more informations in the thread)
12 replies
Open
jacksuri (817 D)
16 Nov 13 UTC
Is webDip down?
I get an "Error triggered: mysql_connect(): [2002] No such file or directory" message every time I try to open up the site.
5 replies
Open
Battalion (2332 D)
21 Oct 13 UTC
Capture Your Capital
I once saw someone refer to a modern map game whereby everyone was given a target on the other side of the map that they had to get to and hold. Does anyone know how this was set up (e.g. which did each country have to aim for?) and would anyone be interested in trying to set a game of it up?
70 replies
Open
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
14 Nov 13 UTC
Banned from the Traditional Catholic Forum for Being Too Traditionally Catholic
Can you believe this? This is an outrage.
40 replies
Open
gopher27 (1606 D Mod)
13 Nov 13 UTC
response to kaner
I was really tempted to join the first new WWIV game but I figured my return should not be anon. But now I am left thinking that I should hold out for Russian Revolution.
12 replies
Open
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
10 Nov 13 UTC
A Capitalist Plan for a Capitalist Country: Sbyvonomics
I for one am sick and tired of “moderate” and “compassionate conservative” politicians. None of these individuals are willing to make the tough choices necessary for getting America out of the hole. However, I’d like to make a few suggestions in order to stir the pot a bit. Here are five steps the federal government can take to fix the economic situation in the United States right now:
Page 2 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Raro (1449 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
sounds good! Oh, and I'd like to buy a house on Park Place.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
You had an actual argument, You are a somewhat educated liberal.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Referring to GC, not Raro
kaner406 (2088 D Mod (B))
11 Nov 13 UTC
Bugger Park Place... build me a hotel on Mayfair please.
Raro (1449 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
... or a trailer park in the Grand Canyon.
G-Man (2516 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
Why not just end Republitard obstruction and inaction for political gain and:

1) Deploy solar, wind, and other clean energy technologies throughout the U.S. and then export those technologies to the rest of the world. After all, we won't be able to have an economy without a livable environment, which we are currently destroying, paving the way for runaway global warming and a mass-extinction event. This would also allow us to survive, as well as cut our global military presence (at least) in half and save us massive amounts of money in minimizing damages from warming (reducing storm intensity, droughts, wildfires, ocean acidification, species extinctions, water scarcity, massive migrations...), eliminating costly oil wars and oil and gas resource shepherding, and downsizing the military. Plus, we make money on the technologies and products we export.

2) Invest in public works projects like high-speed rail, rebuilding infrastructure like roads and bridges, and converting buildings to green buildings, creating jobs and thus increasing revenue from increased productivity.

3) Eliminate special interests from the tax code and close loopholes. Couple that with removal of offshoring and tax shelter breaks, bringing businesses and jobs back to the U.S., and fostering newer businesses and future jobs to stayin the U.S. when they grow. Reverse changes Bush Jr. made to all areas of the tax code, tax all income equally, and return to progressive taxation rates we thrived under in the middle of the 20th century and decrease the large income inequality that has recently surpassed the staggering percentages we saw in the Gilded Age, or robber-baron era.
4) Cap campaign funding and make donor transparency the law. Have TV and radio stations give 'equal time' to political candidates, issues, and debates as part of their licensing. Implement laws that prevent our politicians from going to work for lobbies after their public service, taking as much money as possible out of politics. And let the most popular candidates run against each other, regardless of party, forcing candidates to appeal more to the best interests of everyone and less to special interests.

5) Join the rest of the world and implement a single payer health care system, taking the profit out of health care and ending our status as the country that pays the most for our health care (#1) and gets the least quality for the amount spent (#37 in quality by the World Health Organization and we spend double what #2 spends - three times the average, with lower than average life expectancy).

Use increased revenue from these areas for investment in education and research and industry development to foster future growth.


sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
1. Those technologies are inefficient and a waste of money. Just ask Solyndra.

2. That is not the federal government's job. Read Article I Section VIII of the Constitution.

3. Just get rid of all taxes. It will save you the energy.

4. That is Unconstitutional. Read Article I Section VIII of the Constitution.

5. That is Unconstitutional. Read Article I Section VIII of the Constitution. And besides, nobody wants it. Obamacare is ridiculously unpopular. If you want something like that, go to Taxachusetts.
General Cool (978 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
I'd say slightly educated is pretty good for a high school student.

I think what G-Man is trying to say is that an ultra-capitalist or ultra-socialist system won't work. A mixture of socialist and capitalist economic policies is what will get support. There aren't enough people to support either system.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
That is what we have now. How's it working for you?
ezpickins (1717 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
@Sbyvl: Do you have any arguments besides the constitution?
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
The fact that laizz-faire Capitalism is the only system that has ever worked.
vallk (900 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Explain to me how the country would function with this? You seem to be doing away with national security measures, industry, and infrastructure all in one foul swoop.
How is america supposed to be competitive with an inflated currency? Our economic statistics might balloon, but it would make it painfully difficult for foreign investment to take place, or for america to export without picking up some of the tab.
Decreasing public works budget would hurt infrastructure, another attack on american industry.
You didn't outline this, but what of the education system and the military? I'd assume both would be slashed, but I want to hear for sure before I comment on it.
Scordatura (1396 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Oh yes, because the people who wrote the constitiution would love to have big money in politics, support destroying our infrastructure, and don't support life, liberty, or the pirsuit of happiness. (I'm looking at you, Hamilton)
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
1. Yes, that is what I wish to do away with
2. Gold standard. Control the money supply.
3. It wouldn't, because there would be no corporate tax.
4. It's not the job of the federal government to do that.
5. The Education system would be given back to the states, as there is no Constitutional authority for it. The military would be scaled back somewhat. I would do away with the NSA, the TSA, and other related organizations. They would not be permitted to spy on anyone without a warrant, and there would be no use of drones on American citizens. The Patriot Act would be repealed, and the Department of Homeland Security abolished. The military budget would remain the same, allowing them to build up our navy, and thus create jobs. We must have a strong navy. However, I would bring all American troops stationed on foreign soil home, as we should not be the policeman of the world.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
@Scordatura: If they didn't want it, why didn't they say anything?
vallk (900 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
1) Alright then. Not the answer I was expecting...
2) The Gold Standard would be too damaging to the economy for the reason aforementioned. I agree with the principle, but it's not realistic.
3) American corporations would thrive on the new currency domestically, but the sudden upturn in prices from the point of view of foreign customers would be damaging.
4) (I think this is in response to public works?) The constitution is several hundred years old; I don't see a reason to abide by outdated policy. If a state can maintain and build infrastructure and run a good education system, then it should be given to states. If a state can't then the federal government needs to step in.

I'm with you on the military and the Patriot Act. I have no quarrels with the TSA (as I know it), and I do think the NSA should seriously rollback its' activities, but abolishing it would be even worse.
butterhead (1272 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
I think we should just go back to being a British Colony and then we wouldn't have to make these decisions. #Sarcasm
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
If you don't like the Constitution, go to England. Destroy that country instead. By the way, answer me this question: At what point did the Constitution become outdated? Give me a year.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
The Gold Standard would not destroy our currency, quite the contrary, it would dramatically increase its value, lowering consumer prices. The abandonment of the gold standard led to rampant inflation, and going back to it would do just the opposite.
Lord Skyblade (1886 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
It is the government's job to maintain infrastructure, it has the power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof". Infrastructure is necessary for interstate commerce, which congress has the power to regulate, and it is necessary to "promote the general welfare" which is one of the whole points of the constitution.
Scordatura (1396 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
I think the constitution became irrelevant when the amendment process was added.
General Cool (978 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+1)
The constitution has been outdated for at least 100 years in my opinion, looking at the bill of rights:

1st: Still relevant today in almost all cases
2nd: Not relevant because we have a large enough military to deal with all our internal and external foes. Militias aren't necessary.
3rd: Really? Quartering soldiers in our houses? This hasn't been an issue with no wars being fought on american soil since the civil war.

I'd say the 4th through 10th amendments are all still relevant one way or another today. If you look at 11 through, say, 20, ther are even more that arn't relevant.

Lord Skyblade (1886 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
I completely disagree with Scodatura, the amendment process made the constitution more relevant, not less.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defence[note 1] and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
@GeneralCool: What year exactly?
General Cool (978 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
All right, you got me. It's still relevant. I've also got you now. About half of the things on that list couldn't function with your capitalist plan.
Shep315 (1435 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Talk of a return to the 19th century? Rambling a about the constitution being outdated? Protectionism!?!?!
It would seem its time for everyone pseudo-professional historian to make his diatribe! (Pseudo-professional in the since that I am currently a history/anthropology major, but details)
First I shall tackle constitutional relevancy after a quick read through of the amendments they all seem pretty relevant to me. I see the argument about quartering of soldiers, but why worry about it at all and frankly I'm not so optimistic to say that since no war has been fought in a us state since the civil war (technically parts of WW 2 were in fact fought on our soil, the territories just weren't a state at that time) doesn't mean it won't happen again and quartering could be an issue. After all you find me a roman that actually expected the Huns to sack the city.
The second amendment is another discussion for another day, but remember only half of the militias duty was fighting against foreign aggressors (this is a simple fact of history after all the British were not really foreigners until we decided to declare ourselves Americans and independence wasn't even the initial goal of the war)
The amendment process is also very useful think of the constitution as a skeleton of of sorts or better yet a basic car, it's fine out of the factory but a few tweaks and additions for extra performance are quite nice.
Now onward to the 19th century and protectionism. As has been stated previously foreign nations have the tendency to react negatively to tariffs by creating their own. Too many tariffs kill international trade (in fact one of several causes of the Great Depression and certainly not helpful in alleviating it) of course this assumes everyone wants to make protectionism the rule of the day. More than likely they will just tariff our goods and then some other country will fill the gap.
As for FDR he was no socialist in fact everything he did was to help keep Americans away from more radical socialist ideology. (Source I literally sat in a us history lecture 2 weeks ago in which the professor made that point abundantly clear) in fact I lean more to the conservative side and respect both the presidents Roosevelt quite highly because they were pragmatic men. I prefer that which creates results than that which sticks to ideology, if a liberal has an idea of merit then I will consider it and if a conservative has an idea of merit I will consider it, simple common sense rules the day in my mind. I also like the idea of something akin to the CCC during times of unemployment. I know it's a stop gap but it provides work and could be used to help build up infrastructure.
As a closing statement on economics/industry people need to get over the idea that government and business are antagonistic to each other.
As for the NSA it serves a very important function it has unfortunately been allowed to overstep its bounds. Quite the spying and rein them in and they will be quite useful indeed. As for the military call me a cynic but "sin vis pacem, para bellum". It's easy to forget when you're on top, but a little preparation never hurt anybody.
As a true closing statement the big issue for me at least isn't so much a bloated bureaucracy, but an inefficient one, remember efficiency is the key in management!
sbyvl36 (1009 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
You explain the amendments somewhat well.

Too bad.

Yes he was. The only ones more radical than him were Stalinists and Nazis. His policies were a miserable failure, and we were in a depression until WWII, and after the war we went back into it.

That is reason enough to abolish it.

The bureaucracy itself is unnecessary.
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
(+2)
I was just going to say that one of the refreshing things about VDiplomacy is that there is a general absence of political banter... Of course now I'm feeding the machine too. I really tried to stay away, but this line was just too much:

"As for FDR he was no socialist in fact everything he did was to help keep Americans away from more radical socialist ideology. (Source I literally sat in a us history lecture 2 weeks ago in which the professor made that point abundantly clear)"

Well, there you have it, people. A university professor 'literally' said so. It must be true.
Shep315 (1435 D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Note how I said he made that "abundantly clear" as in he made a very good argument for his perspective, I'd go into greater detail, but seeing that I'm using my iPad at work, I'm not really working with the best platform at the moment

Page 2 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

101 replies
Retillion (2304 D (B))
13 Nov 13 UTC
High quality game with the World War IV (Version 6.2) Variant.
After a three-month break from vdiplomacy, I would like to play Diplomacy again here on this great site. I have just created a new WWIV (V6.2) game.
12 replies
Open
KaiserQuebec (951 D)
12 Nov 13 UTC
how about a low stakes series of games?
I have seen the uber big pots come and go for a while but haven't really seen a quality low stakes game series. Maybe I am not looking hard enough?

Any thoughts?
1 reply
Open
Hypoguy (1613 D)
12 Nov 13 UTC
New game: Conquer the North Sea
Want to try a small quicky for 4?
NorthSeaWars for 4
gameID=16744
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=16744
0 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Try out the brand new earth map.
There's a brand new gigantic earth map for 36 players.
Wanna try it out?
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=16681
0 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
11 Nov 13 UTC
Big Ole Game
0 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
06 Nov 13 UTC
first world war four version 6.2 game!!
http://vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=16662
10 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
08 Nov 13 UTC
Zeus 5 - Does UK Automatically Beat USA?
Say I'm playing as UK and decide to fight USA.
14 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
09 Nov 13 UTC
need new england
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=16561#gamePanel
0 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
28 Oct 13 UTC
Enlightenment & Succession
Anonymous Enlightenment Era variant openings
gameID=16436
2 replies
Open
shiazure (917 D X)
08 Nov 13 UTC
BUG! SC: 7 Units: 6 No orders for Build phase.
What the subject says. What's up with this?
6 replies
Open
Captainmeme (1400 D Mod (B))
04 Nov 13 UTC
(+10)
Thanks vDippers...
...For being such an easy community to Moderate. Webdip is awful :(
40 replies
Open
The Ambassador (2276 D (B))
05 Nov 13 UTC
Bounce question
I really should know this, but thought I'd double check.

Let's say I have an SC that I want to build in. I move a unit out.I then send 2 units to both "attack" that SC. Now let's say one of my opponents attack the SC too, but support it. Now a straight 2 vs 2 results in a bounce, but what about a 2 vs 1 vs 1?
6 replies
Open
Mercy (2131 D)
05 Nov 13 UTC
Question about breaking support
I have a question. Does anyone know what will happen in the following situation:
9 replies
Open
rifo roberto (993 D)
03 Nov 13 UTC
Gunboat (phase 5 minutes)
http://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=16592
1 reply
Open
Captainmeme (1400 D Mod (B))
29 Oct 13 UTC
Imperium Diplomacy Variant Broken
Hi all,
7 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
24 Oct 13 UTC
Support Rules and Dislodgings
I'm guessing you guys play by strange rules. I've never seen this not happen outside of here: One, if a force gets dislodged, the move cuts supports/convoys. Two, to cut a support/convoy, it has to get moved towards. The supporting or convoying unit doesn't have to actually get dislodged.
19 replies
Open
Decima Legio (1987 D)
29 Aug 13 UTC
(+1)
Fogboat invitational: type your daily memories
Classic - Fog of War gunboats are pretty popular here…
63 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
13 Oct 13 UTC
Is Diplomacy Ultimately About Luck
Years ago when I first bought the board game for a group of friends, some of them didn't want to play because they saw the game was all about luck. That idea still rings in my mind from time to time.
190 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
17 Oct 13 UTC
Is Norway Undervalued in 1066?
Something I notice when playing 1066 (v2) is that England and Normandy always do battle, and Norway usually has a lot of leeway to mop things up. I guess the larger size of the North Sea spaces give the illusion that Norway is farther away, but in reality, it's just two spaces away just like Normandy.
4 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
17 Oct 13 UTC
Looking For Replacement
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=16061

Germany still has over 20 SCs, and Italy looks like it's going to overrun. We could use a German player to keep things balanced.
1 reply
Open
Anon (?? D)
11 Oct 13 UTC
Aho Mitakuye Oyasin gameID=16203
I am Tecumseh, the great Pawnee warrior and I come to your tribe with an important message. Please read below...
2 replies
Open
Argotitan (1182 D)
12 Oct 13 UTC
Rational Moves Test
You guys could really use some sort of test to license people to play games in. It's annoying when irrational players ruin the game for rational players by allowing third players to win after overrunning them.
22 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
12 Oct 13 UTC
GOOD POSITION SUB NEEDED
http://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=15723
0 replies
Open
Page 96 of 164
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top