me too

I like that idea.

ill go in too

YAY! once we get more people interested I will start it.

If we don't get enough people for the Chaos map, we could also do it on a smaller map, maybe Haven or World Diplomacy.

quite possibly.

world diplomacy - and I'm in.

How about this. Crowded on the Chaos map. The fixed allainces are the countries in the crowded game...

that doesn't work because no ruhr

(i am in for this btw.)

count me in

kaner and fasces, are you in for my Idea. fasces, problem with that is that then, its the same as a regular game of crowded as far as moves, only difference is you actually have to co-ordinate with people. this way, the game is going to be so out there, that anything and everything will happen.

question: the starting alliances are set right? no possibility to stab there...?
can alliance A ally up with alliance B? or is it just set that all have to fight to death :p

This is an awesome idea. You have my support!

It should probably be that the starting groups should never stab each other (The "nations"), so the game could only end at least in a three-way draw.

Also, I'm in favor for a little geographic bias in the drawing, so we don't have a Portugal-St. Petersburg-Munich alliance. =S

I'm in. Will the alliances be reviled to all? Or will they stay secret?

Your starting alliance's are set. so you cannot stab there. Alliance A CAN Ally with another alliance, but they cannot draw with another alliance, so yes, there can be 4 possible outcomes. either A: stalemate, B: 3 Way Draw among one alliance, C: 2 way Draw if one member of the alliance was killed by the enemy, or D: a solo if both of the persons allies where killed by enemies.
also, there will be no geographic bias, it will be 100% random, to avoid the game from becoming to usual in the movements.
KalelChase- they will be reveled publicly.

yeah count me in.

If we don't get enough people for Chaos, I'd prefer Haven over WorldDip.

im in. and in response to Trisks' thing about long distance alliances, perhaps chao-octopi would be better

I'll play

well, if the Chaos map turns out a train wreck, we can try it on Chaoctopi. but, I think as long as we are lucky and there isn't like, one alliance real close together and the rest are spread out, that people will be ok. ok, I will make it when I get the chance, which will be later today.

I'm absolutely in on this.

http://vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=1133
here we go. game up.

um, are you sure you want it non-password?
you're going to have as of now 20 some players who may join without knowing what they are getting into or what the rules and procedures are.

I have the title listed as Team Game, so if they join and don't know its team game, its there fault for being ignorant.

last year, we made a team game for rim, I remember at least three people who were expecting a normal diplomacy game.

second concern: all of our chaos games have had a few people who fail to communicate or don't show. I'd hate for that to happen and put a team at a disadvantage.

If that happens, we will pause until willing players join. If people join without knowing its team game, they can play anyways, or leave, and if they choose to leave, we will pause and wait for replacements.

Given the CD rate of Chaos games this could take awhile. Unfortunately that seems to be the only solution.