Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 100 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
^__^ (1003 D)
12 Mar 14 UTC
live game: classic map
there has never been a live game on the classic map on this site. i'm kind of wanting to start one. would anyone be interesed in joining?
41 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
22 Mar 14 UTC
Spring 01 Gobble replacement
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=18645

This game hasn't started yet, but France NMR'd for spring 01 so we need a replacement. Since this is gobble earth, France has territory all over the map. It'd be good to get a replacement and you won't start at any disadvantage.
0 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
11 Mar 14 UTC
Join the next Chaos - Public Press game.
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=18632
This type of game is the most chaotic out there, with every turn being a surprise.
3 replies
Open
Wiesl (1079 D)
21 Mar 14 UTC
Westeros
I cant find the Westeros-map, where is it?
1 reply
Open
The Ambassador (2241 D (B))
20 Mar 14 UTC
New take on Modern Diplomacy variant
Anyone notice...
2 replies
Open
KingCyrus (1258 D)
18 Mar 14 UTC
New Variants
How does one make a new variant?
3 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
18 Mar 14 UTC
Premature Draw! Crazy Classic 34P Game
http://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=14633
see below
9 replies
Open
The Ambassador (2241 D (B))
16 Mar 14 UTC
Was VDip down over the weekend?
I tried over and over again and the site was done from multiple devices and browsers. Now it seems I've missed turns in 2 games. Anyone else with the same problem?
13 replies
Open
Lackbeard (966 D)
17 Mar 14 UTC
Quick live
Just looking for a quick 1 v 1 live game :) gameID=18726
0 replies
Open
Science! (880 D)
17 Feb 14 UTC
Question About American Conflict Variant
Are the 'notionally held' SCs essentially normal neutral SCs? For example, if I'm England and I occupy Calgary, do I get a build? Can you build in notionally held SCs?
6 replies
Open
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
05 Dec 13 UTC
On the subject of CYOC and anonymity..
Some input is needed....
16 replies
Open
pyrhos (1268 D)
14 Mar 14 UTC
Map idea
I was sitting home and I thought "it might be possible to make a 1 vs 1 map about mejirestaration"
16 replies
Open
XII (1114 D)
22 Dec 13 UTC
Map Colonial Diplomacy
This map does not use the Trans-Siberian Railway rule. The GM create it want the map more beautiful ?
10 replies
Open
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
11 Mar 14 UTC
New stat CDs / NMRs takeovers.
This thread is for discussion about a new CD / takeover stat.
19 replies
Open
Safari (1530 D)
12 Mar 14 UTC
2 Players Needed for Gunboat Test Game
Hi everyone, I'm setting up a gunboat to test the balance of my map Atlantic Colonies. It's in the stage of testing the final balance, and it's a rather different map, so come play and have fun! It's 1 day 12 hour phases.
http://lab.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=191#gamePanel
(It's on the lab, so just clicking on the game ID won't work--you have to copy the whole URL).
3 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
12 Mar 14 UTC
(+1)
FGA
Anyone interested in taking over Austria on a FGA map? It's currently winning but I lost interest in playing. Please contact- atlas
ID#18302
http://vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=18302
4 replies
Open
Lotte di potere sotto il grande Regno di Mairo
Anyone has the password pls PM me so i can take over
0 replies
Open
Retillion (2304 D (B))
09 Mar 14 UTC
Integrity ?
I have just seen, in the players' profile, the new statistics called "integrity".
30 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
11 Mar 14 UTC
Subs start phase Gobble
I was asked to advertise that
Two subs needed for a new Gobble game.

http://vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=18479
0 replies
Open
Tournament Replacements Needed
There's a current opening we need filled, with plenty of time left in the round to advance. I'd love to have 2-3 players willing to be backups as well. See thread: Dr. Recommended's Travelling Medicine Show
0 replies
Open
Devonian (1887 D)
09 Mar 14 UTC
Why are non-anon games not displaying names prior to starting?
The past few non-anon games I have started started are don't display the players during the pre-game portion. But, I notice some games sill display the players.

I would prefer that players knew who the were going to play before joining. How do I disable the pre-game anon feature when I create a game?
0 replies
Open
y2kjbk (1512 D)
09 Mar 14 UTC
Error joining games
Throwing "undefined variable: maxGames" whenever I try to join a game. Bug I assume? Hopefully can be resolved quickly, I assume I"m not the only one affected.
3 replies
Open
DEFIANT (1311 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
Putin Schooling Barry in Diplomacy
Who would like to take on Putin in Diplomacy? He has schooled the leader of the free world, Barry Obama, already three times, Snowden, Syria and now in Ukraine. Putin would a very formidable Diplomacy player, at least he is showing it in the real world.
Page 1 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
ERAUfan97 (1034 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
im up for the challenge!
mendax (1260 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
To be fair, he didn't exactly have to do a lot for the Snowden files to make the USA look bad.
DEFIANT (1311 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
he didn't have to keep him, could have turned him over. But you are right about one thing, you don't have to do alot to make Barry look bad.
ScubaSteve (1202 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
I'm pretty sure that Putin is the child of James Bond and one of the super hot and kick butt James Bond villains. Certified bad-ass.
jmo1121109 (1200 D Mod)
04 Mar 14 UTC
So come play him over on webdip http://www.webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=7661
Darkarus (929 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
I would take him down only if the bet was a week long trip to Sochi provided there is snow... But also so I can chant USA USA USA in his face when he loses.
G-Man (2466 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
(+2)

Don't listen to Obama's Ukraine critics: he's not 'losing' – and it's not his fight

The ‘do something’ pundits rear their heads. Just like they did on Iraq, Afghanistan and every other crisis of US ‘credibility’

LIVE: Ukraine crisis unfolds with Nato pressure on Russia
Don't listen to Obama's Ukraine critics: he's not 'losing' – and it's not his fight

The ‘do something’ pundits rear their heads. Just like they did on Iraq, Afghanistan and every other crisis of US ‘credibility’

The Guardian
Michael Cohen
Monday 3 March 2014
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/03/obama-ukraine-russia-critics-credibility

In the days since Vladimir Putin sent Russian troops into the Crimea, it has been amateur hour back in Washington.

I don’t mean Barack Obama. He’s doing pretty much everything he can, with what are a very limited set of policy options at his disposal. No, I’m talking about the people who won’t stop weighing in on Obama’s lack of “action” in the Ukraine. Indeed, the sea of foreign policy punditry – already shark-infested – has reached new lows in fear-mongering, exaggerated doom-saying and a stunning inability to place global events in any rational historical context.

This would be a useful moment for Americans to have informed reporters, scholars and leaders explaining a crisis rapidly unfolding half a world away. Instead, we’ve already got all the usual suspect arguments:

Personality-driven Analysis

Let’s start here with Julia Ioffe of the New Republic, a popular former reporter in Moscow who now tells us that Putin has sent troops into Crimea “because he can. That’s it, that’s all you need to know”. It’s as if things like regional interests, spheres of influence, geopolitics, coercive diplomacy and the potential loss of a key ally in Kiev (as well as miscalculation) are alien concepts for Russian leaders.

Overstated Rhetoric Shorn of Political Context

David Kramer, president of Freedom House, hit the ball out of the park on this front when he hyperbolically declared that Obama’s response to Putin’s actions “will define his two terms in office” and “the future of U.S. standing in the world”.

Honorable mention goes to Ian Bremmer of Eurasia Group for calling this crisis “the most seismic geopolitical events since 9/11”. Putting aside the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the Arab Spring, Syria’s civil war and tensions in the South China Sea, Bremmer might have a point.

Unhelpful Policy Recommendations

Admiral James Stavridis, former Supreme Commander of Nato, deserves a shout-out for calling on Nato to send maritime forces into the Black Sea, among other inflammatory steps. No danger of miscalculation or unnecessary provocation there. No, none at all.
Inappropriate Historical Analogies

So many to choose from here, but when you compare seizing Crimea to the Nazi annexation of Austria in 1938, as Leonid Bershidsky did at Bloomberg View, you pretty much blow away the competition.

Making It All About Us

As in practically every international crisis, the pundit class seems able to view events solely through the prism of US actions, which best explains Edward Luce in the Financial Times writing that Obama needs to convince Putin “he will not be outfoxed”, or Scott Wilson at the Washington Post intimating that this is all a result of America pulling back from military adventurism. Shocking as it may seem, sometimes countries take actions based on how they view their interests, irrespective of who the US did or did not bomb.

Missing from this “analysis” about how Obama should respond is why Obama should respond. After all, the US has few strategic interests in the former Soviet Union and little ability to affect Russian decision-making.

Our interests lie in a stable Europe, and that’s why the US and its European allies created a containment structure that will ensure Russia’s territorial ambitions will remain quite limited. (It’s called Nato.) Even if the Russian military wasn’t a hollow shell of the once formidable Red Army, it’s not about to mess with a Nato country.

The US concerns vis-à-vis Russia are the concerns that affect actual US interests. Concerns like nuclear non-proliferation, or containing the Syrian civil war, or stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Those are all areas where Moscow has played an occasionally useful role.

So while Obama may utilize political capital to ratify the Start treaty with Russia, he’s not going to extend it so save the Crimea. The territorial integrity of Ukraine is not nothing, but it’s hardly in the top tier of US policy concerns.

What is America’s problem is ensuring that Russia pays a price for violating international law and the global norm against inter-state war. The formal suspension of a G8 summit in Sochi is a good first step. If Putin’s recalcitrance grows – and if he further escalates the crisis – then that pressure can be ratcheted up.

But this crisis is Putin’s Waterloo, not ours.

Which brings us to perhaps the most bizarre element of watching the Crimean situation unfold through a US-centric lens: the iron-clad certainty of the pundit class that Putin is winning and Obama is losing. The exact opposite is true.

Putin has initiated a conflict that will, quite obviously, result in greater diplomatic and political isolation as well as the potential for economic sanction. He’s compounded his loss of a key ally in Kiev by further enflaming Ukrainian nationalism, and his provocations could have a cascading effect in Europe by pushing countries that rely on Russia’s natural gas exports to look elsewhere for their energy needs. Putin is the leader of a country with a weak military, an under-performing economy and a host of social, environmental and health-related challenges. Seizing the Crimea will only make the problems facing Russia that much greater.

For Obama and the US, sure, there might be less Russian help on Syria going forward – not that there was much to begin with – and it could perhaps affect negotiations on Iran. But those issues are manageable. Meanwhile, Twitter and the opinion pages and the Sunday shows and too many blog posts that could be informative have been filled with an over-the-top notion: that failure to respond to Russia’s action will weaken America’s credibility with its key allies. To which I would ask: where are they gonna go? If anything, America’s key European allies are likely to fold the quickest, because, you know, gas. And why would any US ally in the Far East want Obama wasting his time on the Crimea anyway?

You don’t have to listen to the “do something” crowd. These are the same people who brought you the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, among other greatest hits. These are armchair “experts” convinced that every international problem is a vital interest of the US; that the maintenance of “credibility” and “strength” is essential, and that any demonstration of “weakness” is a slippery slope to global anarchy and American obsolescence; and that being wrong and/or needlessly alarmist never loses one a seat at the table.

The funny thing is, these are often the same people who bemoan the lack of public support for a more muscular American foreign policy. Gee, I wonder why.
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
What a load of trash, Gman. That article is nothing but water towing for one of the most incompetent boobs in history. Obama has plenty of options at his disposal, but he lacks the balls and the brains to use them. Putin has once again made him his bitch. Putin could land troops in Florida, and Obama would do nothing. He's a putz.

The suggestion that war is the only option here or that muscling Russia is the way that critics are suggesting is not only inaccurate, it's intentionally so. It's another intellectually dishonest argument made to cover this guys's ass from his stream of blunders. There are numerous economic and diplomatic maneuvers that could put Putin out of office if implemented.

What's really astonishing is just how incompetent Obama and Kerry are on this. The pretend to be playing hardball, but Putin already know that they are both a couple of pussies that he can shove around at will for another two years. The Russian's just rolled into Ukraine and took Sevastopol without a shot. You don't have to play Diplomacy to understand the significance of that. Wake up Gman. Your mind is mush if you believe anything in that Guardian article. This is not a crisis for Putin. This is yet another huge win for him that will only serve to embolden Russian nationalism and aggression. Obama could have put a stop to this two weeks ago without muscling anyone, but he refuses to exercise sound energy policy here domestically because it does not suit his agenda to cripple the economy, making the nation dependent upon the state. Without flexing a single military muscle the USA has the natural resources to manipulate the cost of oil in Europe so that would make Putin our bitch.
G-Man (2466 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
(+1)
Personally, I don't see Obama as incompetent or a boob at all. To date, I think he's the best president we've had in the last 50 years. As for options at his disposal, what should he have already done and what makes you think he won't use options, like sanctions, in the future? And just how would any U.S. economic or diplomatic maneuvers put Putin out of office?

And just how exactly are Obama and Kerry "pussies" if, as you say, they don't have to use force? How are Obama and Kerry incompetent? It's not the first time Russia's rolled into another country, nor will it likely be the last. Are U.S. administrations pussies when other countries invade other countries? Is my mind "mush" because I disagree with your viewpoint? And is "emboldening Russian nationalism and aggression" a win for Russia, a.k.a. a win for Putin? Plus, just how would Obama have put a stop to this two weeks ago without using force?

Finally, unleashing more fossil fuels is only going to intensify the greenhouse affect on our planet and initiate a state shift of our environment that will be destructive to all life much faster.

Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081648


Approaching a State Shift in Earth’s Biosphere
http://www.stanford.edu/group/hadlylab/_pdfs/Barnoskyetal2012.pdf
(you'll have to type this one into your browser to access it, but it's an inormative study)

Climate Change: NASA
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

Climate Change: U.S. Academy of Sciences and Royal Academy
https://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoices/more-resources-on-climate-change/climate-change-lines-of-evidence-booklet/

Planetary Boundaries
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_boundaries


Providing all Global Energy With Wind, Water, and Solar Power, Part I:
Technologies, Energy Resources, Quantities and Areas of Infrastructure,
and Materials
http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/JDEnPolicyPt1.pdf


Examining the Feasibility of Converting New York State’s All-Purpose
Energy Infrastructure to One Using Wind, Water, and Sunlight
http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/NewYorkWWSEnPolicy.pdf
Darkarus (929 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
Ruffhaus First: most of Obama's critics would not be happy for anything less then war with Russia. Second: yes we have other options besides war however international politics are not simple and our own hands are not clean hear. Third yes we could manipulate the price of oil to some extent but that does not only hurt Russia although forcing a drop in oil prices would equate to a economic disaster in Russia Putin has worked very hard to make Russia resistant to those kinds of actions in the past decade which erodes their effectiveness.
Tomahaha (1170 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
nobody but nobody wants war.

And Obama's hands are in fact tied a bit. But to say he is the best president in 50 years? What exactly has he done to earn that sort of praise? Really, what has he done so far???

Regarding foreign relations with Russia (this topic) he could immediately speak up, he could immediately freeze assets, immediately embargo Russian exports and imports, he could do SOMETHING yet he has not done so yet. Maybe you tend to forget the recent past? When Russia was messing with Georgia, Obama did what exactly? (that answer was NOTHING) when Poland asked for missile defense systems he declined and was caught on a live mike telling the Russians a deal could be made after elected. He told Kerry the Russians were not to be thought of as the enemy and the cold war had ended. In Syria, Obama drew a red line, then he caved and we are STILL waiting for Syria to give up her chemical weapons! Obama not only did nothing but he emboldened this sort of behavior. To claim he is the best president in 50 years!? His foreign affairs have been atrocious to say the least.

Maybe you like Obamacare? Not what he promised and not what America wanted, it's a MESS and helps fewer than it helps by a lot. Maybe you like how he followed through on his promises to put an end to Guantanamo? Maybe you LIKE the spying on Americans and her allies? No, he has done precious little to earn any sort of praise and this Ukraine situation only highlights his inaction and previous inactions leading up to this. Yeah, you want to claim he can do little NOW yet you fail to understand what led to this culmination by giving him a pass!
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
04 Mar 14 UTC
"What is America’s problem is ensuring that Russia pays a price for violating international law and the global norm against inter-state war."
So what about US drones in Pakistan? The Israeli annexion of territories? Yoj have double standards G-Man...
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
04 Mar 14 UTC
And concerning Georgia, it was later stated that Georgia was guilty of provoking the war...
G-Man (2466 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
(+3)
Tomahaha: But I do understand the situation with Russia. I believe he told Kerry and everyone else that the Russians were not to be thought of as the enemy because we were trying to build a new relationship with Russia, particularly so since they've been backsliding under Putin. Now, Putin has only confirmed his position and we have no choice but to see him as an enemy. But at least he's given diplomacy a try, even if it didn't work out.

Things I like that Obama has done:

* Passed an Early Form of Health Care Reform: After five presidents over a century failed to create universal health insurance, signed the Affordable Care Act (2010). Next to tax cuts, deregulation, and unpaid-for wars, raging health care cost has been one of America’s long-term fiscal problems, and along with the impacts of climate change is still one of the top contributors to future debt.

* Passed the Stimulus: Signed $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009 to spur economic growth amid greatest recession since the Great Depression. Weeks after stimulus went into effect, unemployment claims began to subside. Twelve months later, the private sector began producing more jobs than it was losing, and despite massive obstruction of the American Jobs Act, infrastructure bills, anti-tax sheltering and anti-outsourcing laws, clean energy development, creating jobs via government as Reagan and FDR did during recessions in their time, and obstruction of a slew of other growth policies, the economy still continues to improve.

* Passed Wall Street Reform: Signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) to re-regulate the financial sector after its practices caused the Great Recession. The new law tightens capital requirements on large banks and other financial institutions, requires derivatives to be sold on clearinghouses and exchanges, mandates that large banks provide “living wills” to avoid chaotic bankruptcies, limits their ability to trade with customers’ money for their own profit, and creates the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (now headed by Richard Cordray) to crack down on abusive lending products and companies.

* Ended the War in Iraq: Ordered all U.S. military forces out of the country. Last troops left on December 18, 2011.

* Began Drawdown of War in Afghanistan: From a peak of 101,000 troops in June 2011, U.S. forces are now down to 33,000 and may be out by the end of the year.

* Reduced Al-Qaeda and Eliminated Osama Bin Laden: Has systematically taken out Al-Qaeda leadership, eliminated cells, and set them back in many areas. In 2011, ordered special forces raid of secret compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in which the terrorist leader was killed and a trove of al-Qaeda documents were discovered.

* Recapitalized Banks: In the midst of financial crisis, approved controversial Treasury Department plan to lure private capital into the country’s largest banks via “stress tests” of their balance sheets and a public-private fund to buy their “toxic” assets. Got banks back on their feet at essentially zero cost to the government.

* Repealed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”: Ended 1990s-era restriction and formalized new policy allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military for the first time.

* Helped Topple Moammar Gaddafi: In March 2011, joined a coalition of European and Arab governments in military action, including air power and naval blockade, against Gaddafi regime to defend Libyan civilians and support rebel troops. Gaddafi’s forty-two-year rule ended when the dictator was overthrown and killed by rebels on October 20, 2011. No American lives were lost.

* Reversed Bush Torture Policies: Two days after taking office, nullified Bush-era rulings that had allowed detainees in U.S. custody to undergo certain “enhanced” interrogation techniques considered inhumane under the Geneva Conventions. Also released the secret Bush legal rulings supporting the use of these techniques.

* Kicked Banks Out of Federal Student Loan Program, Expanded Pell Grant Spending: As part of the 2010 health care reform bill, signed measure ending the wasteful decades-old practice of subsidizing banks to provide college loans. Starting July 2010 all students began getting their federal student loans directly from the federal government. Treasury will save $67 billion over ten years, $36 billion of which will go to expanding Pell Grants to lower-income students.

* Boosted Fuel Efficiency Standards: Released new fuel efficiency standards in 2011 and 2013 that more than double the fuel economy for cars and trucks by 2025.

* Implemented EPA restrictions on mercury, toxic pollution, and carbon emissions, beginning in December 2011, which will likely lead to the closing of between sixty-eight and 231 of the nation’s oldest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants. Estimated cost to utilities: at least $11 billion by 2016. Estimated health benefits: $59 - $140 billion for mercury and toxic pollution reduction. Reduction of carbon emissions from power plants that drive one third of all U.S. emissions is a start on creating sustainable environmental and energy policy.

* Coordinated International Response to Financial Crisis: To keep world economy out of recession in 2009 and 2010, helped secure from G-20 nations more than $500 billion for the IMF to provide lines of credit and other support to emerging market countries, which kept them liquid and avoided crises with their currencies.

* Passed Mini Stimuli: To help families hurt by the recession and spur the economy as stimulus spending declined, signed series of measures to extend unemployment insurance and cut payroll taxes.

* Increased Support for Veterans: With so many soldiers coming home from Iraq and Iran with serious physical and mental health problems, yet facing long waits for services, increased 2010 Department of Veterans Affairs budget by 16 percent and 2011 budget by 10 percent. Also signed new GI bill offering $78 billion in tuition assistance over a decade, and provided multiple tax credits to encourage businesses to hire veterans.

* Passed Credit Card Reforms: Signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act (2009), which prohibits credit card companies from raising rates without advance notification, mandates a grace period on interest rate increases, and strictly limits overdraft and other fees.

* Eliminated Catch-22 in Pay Equality Laws: Signed Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009, giving women who are paid less than men for the same work the right to sue their employers after they find out about the discrimination, even if that discrimination happened years ago. Under previous law, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the statute of limitations on such suits ran out 180 days after the alleged discrimination occurred, even if the victims never knew about it.

* Improved Food Safety System: In 2011, signed FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, which boosts the Food and Drug Administration’s budget by $1.4 billion and expands its regulatory responsibilities to include increasing number of food inspections, issuing direct food recalls, and reviewing the current food safety practices of countries importing products into America.

* Achieved New START Treaty: Signed with Russia (2010) and won ratification in Congress (2011) of treaty that limits each country to 1,550 strategic warheads (down from 2,200) and 700 launchers (down from more than 1,400), and reestablished and strengthened a monitoring and transparency program that had lapsed in 2009, through which each country can monitor the other.

* Expanded National Service: Signed Serve America Act in 2009, which authorized a tripling of the size of AmeriCorps. Program grew 13 percent to 85,000 members across the country by 2012, when new House GOP majority refused to appropriate more funds for further expansion.

* Expanded Wilderness and Watershed Protection: Signed Omnibus Public Lands Management Act (2009), which designated more than 2 million acres as wilderness, created thousands of miles of recreational and historic trails, and protected more than 1,000 miles of rivers.

* Gave the FDA Power to Regulate Tobacco: Signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (2009). Nine years in the making and long resisted by the tobacco industry, the law mandates that tobacco manufacturers disclose all ingredients, obtain FDA approval for new tobacco products, and expand the size and prominence of cigarette warning labels, and bans the sale of misleadingly labeled “light” cigarette brands and tobacco sponsorship of entertainment events.

* Pushed Federal Agencies to Be Green Leaders: Issued executive order in 2009 requiring all federal agencies to make plans to soften their environmental impacts by 2020. Goals include 30 percent reduction in fleet gasoline use, 26 percent boost in water efficiency, and sustainability requirements for 95 percent of all federal contracts. Because federal government is the country’s single biggest purchaser of goods and services, likely to have ripple effects throughout the economy for years to come.

* Let Space Shuttle Die and Killed Planned Moon Mission: Allowed the expensive ($1 billion per launch), badly designed, dangerous shuttle program to make its final launch on July 8, 2011. Cut off funding for even more bloated and problem-plagued Bush-era Constellation program to build moon base in favor of support for private-sector low-earth orbit ventures, research on new rocket technologies for long-distance manned flight missions, and unmanned space exploration, including the largest interplanetary rovers ever launched, which has been investigating Mars’s potential to support life.

* Invested in Renewable Technology: As part of the 2009 stimulus, invested more than any previous administration in research on smart grids, energy efficiency, electric cars, renewable electricity generation, cleaner coal, and biofuels, even though many of these policies were killed or stifled by the GOP, who refuse to give many times the same amount of Obama's initial investment in renewables to oil and gas subsidies... every year.

* Cracked Down on Bad For-Profit Colleges: In effort to fight predatory practices of some for-profit colleges, Department of Education issued “gainful employment” regulations in 2011 cutting off commercially focused schools from federal student aid funding if more than 35 percent of former students aren’t paying off their loans and/or if the average former student spends more than 12 percent of his or her total earnings servicing student loans.

* Improved School Nutrition: In coordination with Michelle Obama, signed Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act in 2010 mandating $4.5 billion spending boost and higher nutritional and health standards for school lunches. New rules based on the law, released in January, double the amount of fruits and vegetables and require only whole grains in food served to students.

* Expanded Hate Crimes Protections: Signed Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2009), which expands existing hate crime protections to include crimes based on a victim’s sexual orientation, gender, or disability, in addition to race, color, religion, or national origin.

* Brokered Agreement for Speedy Compensation to Victims of Gulf Oil Spill: Though lacking statutory power to compel British Petroleum to act, used moral authority of his office to convince oil company to agree in 2010 to a $20 billion fund to compensate victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico; $6.5 billion already paid out without lawsuits. By comparison, it took nearly two decades for plaintiffs in the Exxon Valdez Alaska oil spill case to receive $1.3 billion.

* Created Recovery.gov: Web site run by independent board of inspectors general looking for fraud and abuse in stimulus spending, provides public with detailed information on every contract funded by $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Thanks partly to this transparency, board has uncovered very little fraud, and Web site has become national model: “The stimulus has done more to promote transparency at almost all levels of government than any piece of legislation in recent memory,” reports Governing magazine.

* Expanded Health Coverage for Children: Signed 2009 Children’s Health Insurance Authorization Act, which allows the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to cover health care for 4 million more children, paid for by a tax increase on tobacco products.

* Expanded Stem Cell Research: In 2009, eliminated the Bush-era restrictions on embryonic stem cell research, which shows promise in treating spinal injuries, among many other areas.

* Provided Payment to Wronged Minority Farmers: In 2009, signed Claims Resolution Act, which provided $4.6 billion in funding for a legal settlement with black and Native American farmers who the government cheated out of loans and natural resource royalties in years past.

* Helped South Sudan Declare Independence: Helped South Sudan Declare Independence: Appointed two envoys to Sudan and personally attended a special UN meeting on the area. Through U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, helped negotiate a peaceful split in 2011.

* Killed the F-22: In 2009, ended further purchases of Lockheed Martin single-seat, twin-engine, fighter aircraft, which cost $358 million apiece. Though the military had 187 built, the plane has never flown a single combat mission. Eliminating it saved $4 billion.
G-Man (2466 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
GOD: I don't agree with every point in the article. And I certainly don't think the U.S. is innocent in the realm of aggressive foreign policy. But purely from a U.S.-centric view, we do have a stake in making sure that Russia doesn't go on a tear against international law and begin empire-building at the expense of its neighbors again.
G-Man (2466 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
(+3)
Tomahaha: On the flip side, regarding foreign relations with Russia, he did speak up and he's still trying to help negotiate a way out for the Russians. It's a bit premature to immediately freeze assets and embargo Russian exports and imports. In Syria, NATO and Russia had worked out a deal to destroy many of Syria's chemical weapons this month, only jeopardized by Russia's actions in Ukraine. But at least he's trying diplomacy first. Except for the missile defense system in Poland, all of these are really actions by other countries against each other or their own people, so it's rather tricky for any outside force to achieve a solution, try as they all might. I don't see other countries having success disarming Syria of chemical weapons or changing Russia's mind. And spying at home and abroad was majorly upped under the Patriot Act of 2001 and again in 2006. I think Obama has only continued those policies and is now seeking to regulate them from overreach.
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
04 Mar 14 UTC
@Ruffhaus: sorry to say so, but the US don't play a role big enough to influence the Russia too much...Russia's key trading partner is Europe, and Europe won't do anything because it needs the Russian gas and oil.
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
04 Mar 14 UTC
@G-Man: I don't have a US-centric view though... ;)
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
04 Mar 14 UTC
Apart from that, the new Ukrainian government made several stupid mistakes; from dissolving the elite Berkut units over the non-demilitarisation of right-wing forces up to the new law that takes away the secured status of the Russian language...
gopher27 (1606 D Mod)
05 Mar 14 UTC
(+1)
I don't really care enough to bother reading what I presume is ill-informed pablum. Without checking, I'm sure G-Man is well represented. A cursory study of Russian History generally shows that external expansion is highly correlated with periods of internal weakness. Whether this is truly causal would involve a bit more in depth analysis.

My only comment is: Shouldn't this be "Volodya Schooling Barry [at] Diplomacy" to conform to English grammar and a sense of stylized parallelism?
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
Gman, if you see Obama as the best president in 50 years, you're just a blind socialist ideologue, or a complete idiot. I really don't mean to be nasty, but it's that simple. It's difficult to take anything that you say after that with any credibility, because it's clear that you'r merely a cheerleader for the last place team. I can go through every single one of your list of his "accomplishments" and completely refute them. Frankly they ready like you got them off a DNC talking points memo, but whatever. He's an all around idiot, but for the purposes of this issue in Ukraine, Putin knows that Obama is absolutely feckless on the world stage, and he can roll all over him, just like he did in Syria.

For those who suggest that the USA doesn't have a role big enough to influence Russia, that's poppycock. The USA could easily supply the oil to Europe that Russia currently does, and completely cripple the Russia economy. The suggestion that the USA is dependent of foreign oil is a lie. Russia right now has one economic ace up their sleeve, and that's the oil that they provide to Europe. Obama could change all of that on a whim, but to do so he'd have to admit to the big lie about the lack of Oil available domestically.
DEFIANT (1311 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
what the F are you saying Gopher, what are you doing, reading a dictionary again.

There is a lot Barry could do. First quit backing down all the time, get some balls, secondly open up public lands to fracking, get that oil flowing from Canada, make it so Russia is not the primary gas distributor to Europe. Hit Russia economically which we can do. Military action in this sense is useless and there is no need for it.

Another idea we could bring forward:. Catherine the Great grabbed the Ukraine so a good portion of East Ukraine is Russian. Get a vote going to see if East Ukraine wants to split off to Russia and West Ukraine can join the near defunct European union.

But you know what Barry's solution is, lets give a Billion dollars to Ukraine, a billion we don't have, nice answer, you twit.

G-man, you're nutts, best president in 50 years, you have got to quit drinking the Kool-Aid a pitcher at a time. There are only two Presidents in recent history that got a high ranking diplomat killed, one is Jimmy Carter, considered the worst President in recent times and the other, your messiah Barry. He has got this country in deep debt with no way out, unemployment, if using 2009 standards is about 11%, and the jobs created are mostly part time and gov't. He has divided this country like no other, energy costs through the roof with the stupid stupid stupid idea of transforming our energy source to wind, solar and water. Simply stupid you can't build enough windmills, solar panels and damns to supply this country with the power it needs. And sure as hell can't to it cost effective, stupid idea.

His inept foreign policy is obvious, nobody takes that clown serious.

Also that's right, the only president to put forth a so called budget that got 0 votes, not even from his own party. He is a leader alright.

G-man you also have to quit reading far far left periodicals, just try reading something from the heritage foundation, or something from Krauthammer(pretty smart guy).

Global warming, G-man, kiss my ass, live here in Wisconsin this year and tell me about global warming. Let me tell you something that 99% of normally informed people know, this planet is in a constant state of climate change. There were dinosaurs in north Dakota, how did it get that warm, driving their flinstone suv's to the dinosaur diner? We have been warming since the ice age it will go back the other way and you are going to wish we had global warming when that happens. Even the guy who created Greenpeace just came out and said there is no man-made global warming, again quit drinking the Kool-Aid and think for yourself, use some common sense.
Tomahaha (1170 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
How did the dinosaurs get to North Dakota?
Well, they drove there of course! They kept driving their cars (REALLY BIG ONES at that!) and this made the planet warmer and warmer, they soon had to move to North Dakota because the seas rose so high they were forced to flee and now that it was so warm, they could do so!

But seriously
The alarmists want you to question any who dare oppose their "settled science".
First off, science is never "settled" and is always questioned and tested and questioned again, to stop questioning simply is not science so any "scientist who asks you to ignore the "deniers" is no scientist at all. But the claim to question these people is smart, yes you should and yes many have an agenda to sell! You are wise to understand big oil has interests that should cause you to question their claims! But wait, you should question ALL who may have an agenda and the alarmists owe their living to promoting global warming. just 20 years ago we had how many climate scientists in the entire world? Now we have hundreds if not thousands all working to promote global warming doom and gloom, if they say it's no longer a worry, they loose their job and now we need no more climate scientists, by denying global warming, they put themselves out of work and make themselves now qualified to do what ...tv weatherman? No, they too need to be questioned yet all we here is "big oil" what about the ipcc themselves and their very real "agenda"?

oh, and the reasons to support Obama... you can like the man, but that list was just TOO far! It indeed read like a Democratic party talking points list. You lost all credibility with that rather insipid list! I get it, the man can do no wrong in your eyes. He isn't as bad as Ruffhaus wants us to believe but c'mon, he isn't nearly as good as Gman wants us to believe either. Somewhere in the middle and I gotta say, that middle point is MUCH closer to Ruffhauses side than Gman's!
ScubaSteve (1202 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
(+2)
In a very technical sense science is never settled and it is true that gravity is merely a theory, however, I would still advise people not to jump off buildings.
Tomahaha (1170 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
Agreed, but you must agree we have some "concrete" theories and some more "iffy' theories, to try and say global warming is in that same concrete theory place...who's kidding who? And that is exactly what these alarmist are trying to have us believe yet every day they have to try and figure out why this and why that. It is in no way "settled" and is not anywhere near "concrete" as they want us to believe. The deniers have plenty of ammunition on their side and to simply dismiss it all while your models keep failing, it doesn't look at all "scientific" in the least!
DEFIANT (1311 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
The problem here guys is that a lot of cost is being applied..........(ie, expensive alternatives, killing the coal and oil industry and al gore making a ton of money on the subject) of which this is likely no more than a natural phenomenon. That's a huge problem.
gopher27 (1606 D Mod)
05 Mar 14 UTC
@DEFIANT....."Putin"==>"Obama"; "Volodya"==>"Barry"; "Vladimir"==>"Barack"
It is all about the parallelism.
GOD (1907 D Mod (B))
05 Mar 14 UTC
@Ruffhaus: it is gas, not oil which Europe needs from Russia and concerning Obama not being hard enough, what were the hard sanctions from Bush after the Georgia war?
DEFIANT (1311 D)
05 Mar 14 UTC
There is a difference with georgia:
First the georgians fired at the russians provoking the incurrsion.
Second, wasnt it only three months left for bushs term. What could he do in that time
And thirdly they did leave I dont think they are leaving ukraine.

Doesnt matter if it is gas or oil.
Captainmeme (1400 D Mod (B))
05 Mar 14 UTC
(+2)
I don't like getting into debates generally, but whenever I see someone denying that Global Warming is happening I have to post this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI5ulKiZAoE

Please watch it all the way through. It's only 3 minutes long and brings up an incredibly good point.

Page 1 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

104 replies
Hirnsaege (1903 D)
09 Mar 14 UTC
Cutting unit dislodged – does the cut work anyway?
A question about game mechanics details:
given that a unit A1 should cut a support of enemy unit B1.
Enemy Units B2 and B3 attack and dislodge A1.
Will the cut on B1 still be in effect or is it cancelled?
2 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
08 Mar 14 UTC
WWIV game needs replacement player~
gameID=18186 One year has passed and Iran has left the game. He was doing well and simply left us high and dry. We need a replacement!
5 replies
Open
diatarn_iv (1458 D)
06 Mar 14 UTC
How to donate
I could not find a page describing how to donate money to the site.
OTOH, I see some users did donate.. so, how do you do it?
3 replies
Open
Alphonse_Z (915 D)
08 Mar 14 UTC
37 Days on BBC two
I'm looking forward to it, a 3 part mini-series on the "July Crisis" airing March 6th thru 8th.Tune in to brush up on your backstabbing skillz!
0 replies
Open
tricky (1005 D)
07 Mar 14 UTC
New game!
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=18553

48 minutes until start!
0 replies
Open
fasces349 (1007 D)
14 Apr 13 UTC
(+4)
Variant Diplomacy World Cup
On the topic of tournaments. I would like to propose a vdip world cup.
477 replies
Open
rokakoma (969 D)
04 Mar 14 UTC
How to make a new map - 101
Hi guys, could somebody write me a brief summary about how to design/create a new map? Where to start (programs, etc)?
12 replies
Open
Page 100 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top